Sunday, August 18, 2013

Are You Pro Obama...Or Pro Democratic Party? If So, Please Go Somewhere Else!

Quite honestly, I started this blog a couple of years ago for one reason and one reason only...mostly so I could write about things that just didn't seem to fit anywhere else.  Here you are sure to find many topics and opinions that are most definitely politically incorrect - and that's largely due to the fact that I don't much care for anything that's political in nature.  With that said, I want to make very, very clear that I have absolutely no use for the idiot we currently have in the White House...or for that matter, pretty much the entire Democratic Party.

So, if you are extremely "PRO OBAMA" or "PRO DEMOCRAT" is the time to exit this go where you can flock with birds of the same feather.  You're not going to find it on this post.

In reality, this post is actually about SYNONYMS and ANTONYMS...sharing what the Democratic Party and the Republican Party have in common...and what truly separates their values...their beliefs...and their agendas.

                                                   Political Synonyms and Antonyms

In a couple ways, the so-called "Democratic Party" and the so-called "Republican Party" are very synonymous.  Both are political parties, representing the wants and wishes of American citizens when it comes to political campaigns for electing officials to government offices, whether it be on a National...State...Regional...or Local level.  However, probably the most common similarity is that the word "Democratic" and the word "Republican" are each comprised of ten letters.

That's where the being "alike" comes to a screeching halt.

I grew up in a Democratic household.  My father and mother voted straight Democratic tickets pretty much their entire lives.  It really didn't seem to matter who was running for what office, they ran with the Democrats all the way.  By the time I was old enough to leave home and enlist in the Marine Corps, I had come to the conclusion that if a real four-footed jackass would have been fitted with a bow-tie and ran for public office, mom and dad would have had absolutely no reservation marking or punching their voting ballots for a candidate with a name like Donkey Kong.  Then two or three years later, they would sit around the kitchen table complaining about how the price of this or that had sky rocketed, or how taxes kept climbing in order to pay for this or that public service or benefit. 

And more often sooner than later, Dad would blurt out something to the effect of, "Who in the hell voted this jackass into office?"

Well, Dad, you did!  You and a whole lot of other jackass followers.

It is very clear now, ever since the biggest jackass of them all was elected to the Presidency in 2008, the goal of the Democratic Party is to make government ever bigger, ever more controlling, and the citizens of this country ever more reliant on the government making all decisions for them, and providing their basic needs.  That has been pretty much Obama's platform ever since announcing his candidacy for the Oval Office.  Perhaps that is why he has had such strong financial backing from major supporters of the United Nations' Agenda 21 - which is to establish an extreme socialistic world under one government, with the world population dependent on government allotments and handouts.  You know, kind of how it is right now in North Phillie, East St. Louie and in the Detroit Hoods - where "Big Daddy Obama" won by a landslide during the last election.  No one one shows any drive to do any better...and neighborhoods are nothing more than falling down slums, as government dependents sit on their asses waiting for the first of the month to roll around and the start of another monthly welfare hand out.

That pretty much sums up the agenda of the Democratic Party.  Their only investment in the future of America is to make U.S. citizens more dependent on government...more dependent on government welfare and hand outs.

I've never truly considered myself a Republican, but can honestly say that I've never taken a government handout in the form of welfare or unemployment monies.  Oh, there have been plenty of times when I was "unemployed"...but it doesn't mean that I couldn't find enough work to keep my family fed, a roof over their heads, and clothes on their back.  It just took some real effort and some real creativity instead of just waiting for the postman to drop off a government check and food stamps.

What truly separates the majority of Democrats from the majority of Republicans is that the latter tend to have much better work ethics and are far more willing to work to enjoy the nicer things in life...while the other side does nothing but bitch and moan about having nothing, and feeling that those who have worked for their gains should freely "Share The Wealth".  Hmmm...sounds like another Obama plan.

The Republican Party believes in an extremely scaled down government, far fewer public employees, fewer government hand outs...and establishing the incentives that will put more Americans to work and establish more private sector working opportunities.  In other words, to rebuild the U.S. workforce and the U.S. economy.

Politics in this country have become extremely dirty, and extremely UN-American.  Those elected to the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives no longer truly represent their constituents.  They are their to pad their pockets, and most all are on the take one way or another.  Even Montana's two Democratic U.S. Senators are very suspect of receiving "under the table" money.  Both continue to support radial environmental agendas that are largely rejected by those they are supposed to represent.  One great example was when a Western Montana resident and voter went by Senator Jon Tester's Washington , D.C. office earlier this spring to see if he could talk with the Senator.  He was not in the office, so his constituent ended up talking with his top aide, and when the conversation turned to the need for more stringent wolf control and less efforts by Tester to close off public access to more public lands, that aide told him that the Senator would not support or challenge anything that was contrary to the goals of environmental and animal rights groups like the Humane Society of the United States.

So, who's payroll is Tester on anyway?

The world is in turmoil, and our officials in Washington, D.C. fully realize that Americans are now living in a powder keg with a smoldering fuse.  Obama's efforts to attack our 2nd Amendment rights to "Keep and Bear Arms" has been a violation of our Constitutional Rights, and fully shows that he fears a full blown revolution, such as those now taking place around the world.

If it happens here, what outcome would you predict?  If there are "winners" and "losers", do you think the winners will be those who have earned the cash to well arm themselves and stockpile ammunition, or do you think it will be those who sit around waiting for the government to provide them with a substandard gun and a handful of the 6-billion rounds of ammo our government recently stockpiled?

Toby Bridges,


No comments:

Post a Comment